We have been reading several news
items about the RBI’s proposal to issue polymer notes in India, on
experimental basis. For last couple of moths I had in my mind a suggestion
about introduction of ₹ 200 denomination currency note.
As you may be aware some countries like Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Spain who have Euro as their currency have gone in for currency note of € 200 denomination right from day one of introduction of EUR (€). Countries like Switzerland [Swiss Franc (CHF)] and Israel [Shekel (₪)] do have 200 denomination bank notes. Similarly some other countries like Kazakhstahan (Tenge), Kyrgyzsthan (Som), Mexico (Peso) and North Korea (Won) do have denomination ₹ 200 bank notes.
For several reasons mentioned below I think Govt and RBI can closely examine the suggestion of introduction of currency of ₹ 200 denomination.
Pros:
As you may be aware some countries like Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Spain who have Euro as their currency have gone in for currency note of € 200 denomination right from day one of introduction of EUR (€). Countries like Switzerland [Swiss Franc (CHF)] and Israel [Shekel (₪)] do have 200 denomination bank notes. Similarly some other countries like Kazakhstahan (Tenge), Kyrgyzsthan (Som), Mexico (Peso) and North Korea (Won) do have denomination ₹ 200 bank notes.
For several reasons mentioned below I think Govt and RBI can closely examine the suggestion of introduction of currency of ₹ 200 denomination.
Pros:
·
New
denomination will ease pressure on ₹ 100 and ₹ 500 denominations. Ther is no
intermittent currency between ₹ 100 and ₹ 500. Due to inflation purchasing power
of money has got considerably reduced. Average value of a normal cash
transaction has gone up. Public at large have to use notes of ₹ 100
denominations for small routine transactions. Due to excessive fear associated
with counterfeit notes of ₹ 500 denominations the pressure on ₹ 100/- note has
further gone up. People readily accept ₹ 100 note as compared to ₹ 500 currency
note. For a transaction of ₹ 200+ or ₹ 400+ one may use ₹ 500 as well as ₹ 100
denomination notes. As a result the active life of ₹ 100 notes (in terms of
days) in circulation has come down.
·
In India preference
of public at large is towards cash transaction. The spread plastic currency –
Debit / credit cards and e-transaction yet to reach critical level.
·
Symbol
₹ as approved by GOI (mix of Roman and Devanagari alphabet) can be used on this
currency note right from day one.
·
Several
new security features (even from experimental angle) can be introduced (given
that it is a moderate value denomination note) on a new denomination currency
note.
·
Instead
of printing polymer notes of ₹ 10, 20, 50 or ₹ 100 denominations it
would be relatively easier to introduce notes of ₹ 200 denominations on trial
basis. As the note of this currency denomination currently does not exist. If
after certain point of time it is found that the currency note of this
denomination is not changing hands well or is not used by public at large on
the expected lines demonetization of ₹ 200 denomination notes would be very
easy as there will not be any legacy of different design, patterns and tranche
specific features and all notes in circulation would be that of recent past.
·
It
is also possible to first to go-in for banknotes/currency notes of ₹ 200
denominations in paper cum cotton (tricot) material as used currently. Polymer
notes may require creation of lot of awareness among the public so that public
will not find any difficulty while dealing with these notes (Polymer has larger
life span if used properly and can be washed with soap, water, dried etc.
Counterfeiting polymer notes is difficult).
As polymer notes can be washed, some noting such as name etc written by some rough users can be washed. Life of note will not get impacted due to such writing.
As polymer notes can be washed, some noting such as name etc written by some rough users can be washed. Life of note will not get impacted due to such writing.
·
RBI
can think of introducing certain new security features and improving on certain
old security features that are present in certain higher denomination currency
notes like: Variable colour ink, Checksum, Constellation, different Watermarks
(Standard watermark / Digital watermark / Infra-red and ultra-violet
watermarks, Printing registration, Raised printing, Bar code, Security thread ,
selective usage of Magnetic ink, Micro-print, Matted surface, Special features
for people with impaired sight, increase in paper dimension / size of currency.
Size of ₹ 200 denominations can be placed between size of ₹ 100 and ₹ 500
denomination. Higher denomination like ₹ 200, ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 notes can have
distinctive tactile patterns along the edges of the notes e.g the ₹ 200 note
can have vertical lines running from the bottom / bottom center to the
right-hand corner. Note of ₹ 500 can have diagonal lines running down the
right-hand edge and ₹ 1000 note can have vertical lines running from the bottom
centre to the left-hand corner and so on. Certain features like Check-sum, Bar
code can be introduced. Increase in the numbering digits from 6 to 11
(excluding Alpha character/s) can also be considered for this note on test
basis which can be later extended to other high denomination notes like ₹ 100,
₹ 500 and ₹ 1000.
Con:
·
Note
handling habits of Public may need to be changed. Public at large should be
made aware that polymer notes should not be folded, ironed (small tear can rip
the note in two halves). Time required for creating public awareness, looking
at the need to update Note Refund Rules would take considerable time. If RBI /
Govt proposes ₹ 200 denomination note together with the polymer form of
material instead of tricot (mixture of paper and cotton) material.
RBI can seek views of currency experts, general public, other central Banks / Regulators on their experience and seek broader views on this aspect.
If after debate within RBI it is felt that RBI can further examine the suggestion, below mentioned provisions of Reserve Bank of India Act may need to be considered:
·
In
terms of Section 25 of RBI Act, 1934 the design of banknotes is required to be
approved by the Central Government and that the recommendation for a design of
banknote / currency note is to come with the recommendations of the Central
Board of the Reserve Bank of India.
·
As
per Sec 24 (1) of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 bank notes shall be of the
denominational values of two rupees, five rupees, ten rupees, twenty rupees,
fifty rupees, one hundred rupees, five hundred rupees, one thousand rupees,
five thousand rupees and ten thousand rupees or of such other denominational
values, not exceeding ten thousand rupees, as the Central Government may, on
the recommendation of the Central Board, specify in this behalf. For
introducing a new denominational value of two hundred rupees, the Central
Government may have specify ₹ 200 in this behalf following the recommendation
under Sec 24 (1) of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and this can follow after
the RBI’s Central Board recommends for it since this denomination unfortunately
does not figure in the aforesaid Section.
·
In
terms of Sec 25 of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 form of bank notes (its
design, form and material of bank notes shall be such as may be approved by the
Central Government) and the recommendation for which has to come from RBI’s
Central Board. This is true for paper cum cotton (tricot) material or for
introduction of polymer note/s or of any denomination Sec 24 (1) of Reserve
Bank of India Act, 1934.
·
Every
banknote issued by Reserve Bank of India shall be legal tender (at any place in
India in payment or on account for the amount expressed therein) provided it is
guaranteed by the Central Government and it should be subject to meeting provisions
of sub-section (2) Section 26 of RBI Act, 1934. Currently ₹ notes of ₹ 2, ₹ 5,
₹ 10, ₹ 20, ₹ 50, ₹ 100, ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 denomination have status of a legal
tender.
Initially RBI with the concurrence of Central Govt. can consider introducing in relatively smaller number / quantity to test the usage (with enough penetration), adaptability by public and other relevant incidence at select towns / cities.
In the event the idea of ₹ 200 denominations does not go well for any or various reason/s RBI may discontinue printing of further ₹ 200 denominations notes or may go to Central Govt. to get direction or non-issue or discontinuance of such denominational values as Govt may specify in this behalf.
As per my information EURO zone is using this denomination for almost a decade same is with the CHF and Israel Shekel etc.
However study / analysis of experience of these countries with respect to CHF / € 200 denomination may not be very useful in our case as CHF / € 200 denominations currency notes command considerable purchasing power and level of the penetration of plastic card / credit /debit card in the society.
As per the recent press reports the Govt/RBI, on experimental basis, has initiated circulation of polymer currency note of ₹ 10 denominations which it proposes later to extend to other parts of the country. It is worthwhile to have a public debate on this idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment