Sunday 30 March 2014

 1273552, HARSIMRAT KAUR , F1, Q 31  
 Comment on factors impacting growth in Non-life insurance
INTRODUCTION
General Insurance or non-life insurance policies, including automobile and homeowners policies, provide payments depending on the loss from a particular financial event. General insurance typically comprises any insurance that is not determined to be life insurance. It is called property and casualty insurance in the U.S. and Canada and Non-Life Insurance in Continental Europe.
The total Gross Written Premium (GWP) for the Indian general insurance industry during FY 2012-13 was INR69,081 Crores (USD12,592 million) as against INR58,120 Crores (USD10,594 million) in FY 2011-12 representing an annual growth of a little over 18 per cent.
Ø ICICI Lombard’s total business at INR6134 Crores (USD1,118 million) is close to Oriental’s figure of INR6544 Crores (USD1,193 million).
Ø The industry business growth up to February 2013, over 2012, was 19.3 per cent as against 23.4 per cent in FY 2011-12.
DISCUSSION
 CONDITION OF NON- LIFE INSURANCE:
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/pixel.gif
·        Non-life companies should improve their underwriting discipline and pricing should be based on their assessment of risks. Free pricing — where insurers can fix premiums and offer discounts — has also widened the choice for consumers.
·        Companies are offering customised products and also bundling insurance products. However, a consumer who buys a non-life product sees it as an expense. So, non-life insurance still plays second fiddle to life insurance. The premium collected by non-life companies in India is only a fifth of the amount garnered by life companies.
·        Higher disposable incomes will help push up the sales of non-life products — such as motor, health, property or fire insurance — to individuals. The creation of more assets will also increase sales of general insurance covers. Robust economic growth is, therefore, the key to improving penetration in the non-life business.
·        Health insurance is a major driver, with a 40% rise in the health premium during the period under review. Clearly, with rising health costs, there is growing awareness among consumers. However, pricing is a cause for concern with hospitals overcharging patients. Costs can be lowered if hospitals offer discounts to insurers based on volumes. A pragmatic solution is for hospitals to adopt low-cost models and a regulatory body to enforce fair competition among hospitals. This will be in the interest of both consumers and insurers.
 FACTORS OF GROWTH:

·        Due to inflation-related increases in claims expenses, such as the rising cost of spare parts.
·         The inefficient underwriting practices in the industry also contribute to the high claims rates. For example, only 2.6% of claims were rejected by non-life industry in fiscal 2010-11.
·        The operational expense ratio of the Indian non-life industry deteriorated further in fiscal 2010-11 despite already being the highest globally.
·         This deterioration was evident among both public and private insurers. Operational expenses increased as insurance players continued to invest in the expansion of their business and to compete with incoming international players.
·         India’s Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is contemplating an increase in the limit on foreign direct investment in insurers to 49% from 26%.
·        .The acquisition ratio of India’s non-life insurers declined in fiscal 2010-11 as new and low-cost distribution channels emerged, especially among private-sector providers, where acquisition costs are lower than among public insurers. As a result, total commission expenses rose by only 9.7% despite GWP growth of 19.8%.
·         Investment income for India’s non-life industry remained stable in fiscal 2010-11, primarily due to the strong performance by local equity markets during the year.
·         The industry’s high investment ratio continued to help the Indian non-life industry compensate for poor underwriting results.
 NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKETS IN CHINA AND INDIA ARE FAST GAINING IMPORTANCE IN THE ASIAN REGION: After a break in 2001, growth rates in the non-life insurance business resumed their faster pace.  It expected growth to substantially exceed that of most OECD markets. Nonetheless, it added, weak stock markets in 2001 and 2002 had taken their toll on insurers' capital bases, thus reinforcing the need to focus on underwriting quality.

·        Deregulation and phase-out of state ownership were fast reshaping the insurance landscape, and the industry would see further consolidation in the coming years.
·        This would lead to more concentrated and polarised markets. State-owned insurers were still a significant force in Asia - accounting for over a fourth of the premiums outside Japan, while foreign insurers - though making up some 40 per cent of all insurers - had only a 10 per cent market share.
·        Nevertheless, foreign insurers were poised to take on a more active role in the development of the region's insurance business over the medium to longer term, despite recent reticence in business expansion.
CONCLUSION :
In the long run the insurance industry is still poised for a strong growth as the domestic economy is expected to grow steadily. This will lead to rise in per capita and disposable income, while savings are expected to be stable.
The non-life insurance industry has been growing in excess of 20% over the last two years however the penetration was as low as 0.7% of the GDP in FY10. The key factors for growth include:

  • Product pricing, innovation and simplicity
  • Distribution
  • Compensation
  • Governance and regulatory changes
  • Health insurance
  • Innovative products to counter the competition
  • Improved fraud control mechanisms
  Comment on factors impacting growth in Non-life insurance
INTRODUCTION
General Insurance or non-life insurance policies, including automobile and homeowners policies, provide payments depending on the loss from a particular financial event. General insurance typically comprises any insurance that is not determined to be life insurance. It is called property and casualty insurance in the U.S. and Canada and Non-Life Insurance in Continental Europe.
The total Gross Written Premium (GWP) for the Indian general insurance industry during FY 2012-13 was INR69,081 Crores (USD12,592 million) as against INR58,120 Crores (USD10,594 million) in FY 2011-12 representing an annual growth of a little over 18 per cent.
Ø ICICI Lombard’s total business at INR6134 Crores (USD1,118 million) is close to Oriental’s figure of INR6544 Crores (USD1,193 million).
Ø The industry business growth up to February 2013, over 2012, was 19.3 per cent as against 23.4 per cent in FY 2011-12.
DISCUSSION
 CONDITION OF NON- LIFE INSURANCE:
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/pixel.gif
·        Non-life companies should improve their underwriting discipline and pricing should be based on their assessment of risks. Free pricing — where insurers can fix premiums and offer discounts — has also widened the choice for consumers.
·        Companies are offering customised products and also bundling insurance products. However, a consumer who buys a non-life product sees it as an expense. So, non-life insurance still plays second fiddle to life insurance. The premium collected by non-life companies in India is only a fifth of the amount garnered by life companies.
·        Higher disposable incomes will help push up the sales of non-life products — such as motor, health, property or fire insurance — to individuals. The creation of more assets will also increase sales of general insurance covers. Robust economic growth is, therefore, the key to improving penetration in the non-life business.
·        Health insurance is a major driver, with a 40% rise in the health premium during the period under review. Clearly, with rising health costs, there is growing awareness among consumers. However, pricing is a cause for concern with hospitals overcharging patients. Costs can be lowered if hospitals offer discounts to insurers based on volumes. A pragmatic solution is for hospitals to adopt low-cost models and a regulatory body to enforce fair competition among hospitals. This will be in the interest of both consumers and insurers.

FACTORS OF GROWTH:

·        Due to inflation-related increases in claims expenses, such as the rising cost of spare parts.
·         The inefficient underwriting practices in the industry also contribute to the high claims rates. For example, only 2.6% of claims were rejected by non-life industry in fiscal 2010-11.
·        The operational expense ratio of the Indian non-life industry deteriorated further in fiscal 2010-11 despite already being the highest globally.
·         This deterioration was evident among both public and private insurers. Operational expenses increased as insurance players continued to invest in the expansion of their business and to compete with incoming international players.
·         India’s Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is contemplating an increase in the limit on foreign direct investment in insurers to 49% from 26%.
·        .The acquisition ratio of India’s non-life insurers declined in fiscal 2010-11 as new and low-cost distribution channels emerged, especially among private-sector providers, where acquisition costs are lower than among public insurers. As a result, total commission expenses rose by only 9.7% despite GWP growth of 19.8%.
·         Investment income for India’s non-life industry remained stable in fiscal 2010-11, primarily due to the strong performance by local equity markets during the year.
·         The industry’s high investment ratio continued to help the Indian non-life industry compensate for poor underwriting results.






NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKETS IN CHINA AND INDIA ARE FAST GAINING IMPORTANCE IN THE ASIAN REGION: After a break in 2001, growth rates in the non-life insurance business resumed their faster pace.  It expected growth to substantially exceed that of most OECD markets. Nonetheless, it added, weak stock markets in 2001 and 2002 had taken their toll on insurers' capital bases, thus reinforcing the need to focus on underwriting quality.

·        Deregulation and phase-out of state ownership were fast reshaping the insurance landscape, and the industry would see further consolidation in the coming years.
·        This would lead to more concentrated and polarised markets. State-owned insurers were still a significant force in Asia - accounting for over a fourth of the premiums outside Japan, while foreign insurers - though making up some 40 per cent of all insurers - had only a 10 per cent market share.
·        Nevertheless, foreign insurers were poised to take on a more active role in the development of the region's insurance business over the medium to longer term, despite recent reticence in business expansion.
CONCLUSION :
In the long run the insurance industry is still poised for a strong growth as the domestic economy is expected to grow steadily. This will lead to rise in per capita and disposable income, while savings are expected to be stable.
The non-life insurance industry has been growing in excess of 20% over the last two years however the penetration was as low as 0.7% of the GDP in FY10. The key factors for growth include:

  • Product pricing, innovation and simplicity
  • Distribution
  • Compensation
  • Governance and regulatory changes
  • Health insurance
  • Innovative products to counter the competition
  • Improved fraud control mechanisms

Saturday 29 March 2014

1273539-Gurbir Singh Sidhu-F1-Q23 Comment on Products strategy and design in the present scenario

Introduction

Product design is the creation of objects of utilitarian value to people. The Product Design involves an understanding of materials, processes, ergonomics, human behaviour and systems. The various product strategies are Product-Positioning, Product-Repositioning, Product-Overlap, Product Scope, Product-Design, Product Elimination, New Product, Diversification, Value-Marketing.

Discussion

Product Strategy

Core productthis is the end benefit for the buyer and answers the question: What is the buyer really buying? For example, the buyer of a car is buying a means of transport, the buyer of an aspirin is buying pain relief and the buyer of financial advice is hoping to buy financial security and peace of mind.
Formal productthis is the actual physical or perceived characteristics of your product including its level of quality, special features, styling, branding and packaging.

Augmented productthe support items that complete your total product offering such as after-sales service, warranty, delivery and installation.

Product Design

Innovation provides much of the competitive impetus for the development of new products, with new technology often requiring a new design interpretation. It only takes one manufacturer to create a new product paradigm to force the rest of the industry to catch up - fuelling further innovation. Products designed to benefit people of all ages and abilities—without penalty to any group—accommodate our swelling aging population by extending independence and supporting the changing physical and sensory needs we all encounter as we grow older.

Conclusion

Product designers need to consider all of the details: the ways people use and abuse objects, faulty products, errors made in the design process, and the desirable ways in which people wish they could use objects. Many new designs will fail and many won't even make it to market. Some designs eventually become obsolete.

Choosing and implementing your product positioning strategy is an important task. You need to determine your product’s competitive advantages (i.e.: what sets it apart from its competitors) and then based on this information, decide how to position your offering in the market. Quality, features, design, branding, packaging, labelling and service all affect the way your product is positioned. 


Thursday 27 March 2014

1273499, Akhter Rashid, F1, Sanjay, F2

http://youtu.be/JK9EYB9e2mg

1273566 madhu kumari>ques 2 Comment on Standardization to reduce claims loss in Non-Life Insurance

ques 1> 1273566- madhu kumari F1> Rajat kumar >F2 http://youtu.be/1_p4LPfSoA8

ques 2> Comment on Standardization to reduce claims loss in Non-Life Insurance ?



INTRODUCTION

insurance is the equitable transfer of the risk of a loss, from one entity to another in exchange for payment. It is a form of risk management primarily used to hedge against the risk of a contingent, uncertain loss.
According to study texts of The Chartered Insurance Institute, there are the following categories of risk.
  1. Financial risks which means that the risk must have financial measurement.
  2. Pure risks which means that the risk must be real and not related to gambling
  3. Particular risks which means that these risks are not widespread in their effect, for example such as earthquake risk for the region prone to it.
Discussion 

The non-life insurance industry is poised to register a net loss in the fourth quarter, due to the anticipated deluge of claims in the aftermath of “Supertyphoon Yolanda.”
The Insurance Commission said the total insurance coverage in areas hardest hit by Supertyphoon Yolanda was estimated at P70 billion, the bulk of which was accounted for by the non-life insurance sector.
“The non-life insurance industry posted a significant increase in net income in the first three quarters of the year. Unfortunately, that net income may be wiped out in the fourth quarter,” Insurance Commissioner Emmanuel Dooc said in a briefing Wednesday.
He said the expected loss of non-life insurance firms in the last quarter of 2013 would be due to claims related to Yolanda and the recent earthquake. 

Conclusion

The qualitative answer that the optimal capital rule(s) should satisfy two general principles.
First, the additional capital required for firms believed to be inadequately capitalized should be
less than the amount that would be required if they were known with certainty to be inadequately
capitalized. With imperfect risk assessment (classification), capital requirements for firms that
appear weak should be tempered: they should be lower than the optimal amounts with perfect
risk assessment. The intuition is straightforward. Because higher capital requirements distort
some sound firms’ decisions (and fail to constrain some weak firms), tempering of the
requirements reduces those costs and minimizes total costs. While tempering sacrifices benefits
for correctly classified weak firms, it reduces costs for sound firms that are mistakenly constrained by the rule The second general principle deals with the relationship between capital requirement
stringency (the efficient level of tempering) and the extent of market discipline. As market
discipline increases, fewer firms will hold too little capital in relation to risk without capital
regulation. For a given Type 1 error rate (proportion of sound firms forced to hold more capital),
higher market discipline therefore implies that decisions of a greater number of sound firms’ will
be inefficiently distorted. Moreover, for a given level of power to identify weak firms correctly