1273577 Monika F1, Q47- IMF’s growth projection for India?
Introduction-
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an International Organization that was initiated in 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference and formally created in 1945 by 29 member countries. The IMF's
stated goal was to assist in the reconstruction of the world’s international post–World War II. Countries contribute money to a pool through a quota system from which countries
with payment imbalances can borrow funds temporarily. Through this activity and others such as
surveillance of its members' economies and the demand for self-correcting
policies, the IMF works to improve the economies of its member countries
The IMF promotes international monetary
cooperation and exchange stability, facilitates the balanced growth of
international trade, and provides resources to help members in balance of
payments difficulties or to assist with poverty reduction.
With its near-global membership of 188 countries, the IMF is uniquely placed to help member governments take
advantage of the opportunities—and manage the challenges—posed by globalization
and economic development more generally.
The IMF tracks global economic trends and performance, alerts its member countries
when it sees problems on the horizon, provides a forum for policy dialogue, and
passes on know-how to governments on how to tackle economic difficulties.
The IMF provides
policy advice and financing to members in economic difficulties and also
works with developing nations to help them achieve macroeconomic stability and
reduce poverty.
The IMF has evolved along with the global economy
throughout its 65-year history, allowing the organization to retain its central
role within the international financial architecture
As the world economy struggles to restore growth
and jobs after the worst crisis since the Great Depression, the IMF has emerged
as a very different institution. During the crisis, it mobilized on many fronts
to support its member countries. It increased its lending, used its
cross-country experience to advise on policy solutions, supported global policy
coordination, and reformed the way it makes decisions. The result is an
institution that is more in tune with the needs of its 188 member countries.
- Stepping up crisis lending. The IMF
responded quickly to the global economic crisis, with lending commitments
reaching a record level of more than US$250 billion in 2010. This figure
includes a sharp increase in concessional lending (that’s to say,
subsidized lending at rates below those being charged by the market) to
the world’s poorest nations.
- Greater lending flexibility. The IMF has
overhauled its lending framework to make it better suited to countries’
individual needs. It is also working with other regional institutions to
create a broader financial safety net, which could help prevent new
crises.
- Providing analysis and advice. The
IMF’s monitoring, forecasts, and policy advice, informed by a global
perspective and by experience from previous crises, have been in high
demand and have been used by the G-20.
- Drawing lessons from the crisis. The
IMF is contributing to the ongoing effort to draw lessons from the crisis
for policy, regulation, and reform of the global financial architecture.
- Historic reform of governance. The IMF’s
member countries also agreed to a significant increase in the voice of
dynamic emerging and developing economies in the decision making of the
institution, while preserving the voice of the low-income members.
Discussion
Last Year The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on 9th July
2013 lowered India’s growth forecast for 2013-14 to 5.6% from
the 5.8% it projected in April, holding that the risks of a longer downturn in
emerging market economies had increased because of domestic capacity
constraints, slowing credit growth and weak external demand.
In an update to its April World Economic Outlook, IMF said India’s
growth would recover to 6.3% in 2014-15, marginally lower than its April
forecast.
India’s economy expanded 5%
in the year ended 31 March, the slowest pace in 10 years, as high borrowing
costs intended to douse inflation hurt corporate investment and consumer spending, and weak external
demand curbed export growth.
The finance ministry expects
growth to exceed 6% in the current financial year.
However, the projections by IMF and the finance ministry are not comparable because they use different
data sets to measure economic growth.
IMF cautioned that while old risks such as a protracted recession
in the euro area remain, new threats have emerged in the emerging markets
because of the anticipated unwinding of monetary policy stimulus by the US,
which may lead to sustained capital flow reversals.
The Fund revised down its global growth forecast to 3.1% in 2013 from 3.3% projected earlier.
While the US growth estimate has been lowered to 1.7% in 2013 from 1.9%
projected in April, economic output in the euro area is expected now to
contract 0.6%, compared with the 0.8% contraction projected earlier.
As the US economy recovers faster than expected, risk appetite for
emerging market assets will diminish, said
D.K Joshi chief economist at the rating agency Crisil Ltd “So
there will be hiccups in the short run,” he said.
IMF said growth continued to disappoint in major emerging market
economies, reflecting, to varying degrees, infrastructure bottlenecks and other
capacity constraints, slower external demand growth, lower commodity prices,
financial stability concerns, and in some cases, weaker policy support.
The Fund said that for stronger global growth, major advanced
economies should maintain a supportive macroeconomic policy mix, combined with
credible plans for reaching medium-term debt sustainability. Many developing
economies have to opt for structural reforms while maintaining macroeconomic
stability to sail through the crisis.
“Emerging market economies
have generally been hit hardest, as recent increases in
advanced economy interest rates and asset price volatility, combined with
weaker domestic activity have led to some capital outflows, equity price
declines, rising local yields, and currency depreciation,” it said.
IMF advocated that the US continue its monetary policy stimulus
until its economic recovery is well-established. “Clear communication on the
eventual exit from monetary stimulus will help reduce volatility in global
financial markets,” it said.
The Indian currency has
been the worst performer against the dollar since the US Federal Reserve
said in May that it would gradually start withdrawing monetary stimulus,
starting in September, should the economic recovery continue as expected. In
June alone, the currency tumbled 4.9%, making it the worst performer among 78
global currencies, according to Bloomberg data,
as investors pulled money out of Indian stocks and bonds.
In the quarter to June, the currency lost 8.6%. The rupee closed
at 60.14 a dollar on Tuesday after strengthening to an intra-day high of 59.65,
a sharp rebound from Monday’s intra-day record low of 61.21.
The impact of capital outflows demonstrated the extent to which
India has become dependent on foreign funds that have gushed into emerging
markets after the Fed embarked on an easy money policy to stimulate the US
economy following the 2008 financial crisis.
Emerging markets received at least $250 billion a year between
2010 and 2012. Since 2009, foreign investors have pumped about $90 billion into
Indian equities and $24 billion into bonds.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF)
has bumped up India's growth forecast for the current fiscal by more than half
a percentage point thanks
to a normal monsoon and improved exports, virtually admitting that it may have
been too pessimistic in October when it pegged the number at less than 4 per
cent.
Finance minister P Chidambaram had led India's strong protests
against IMF's assessment, which was made amid economic gloom and a depreciating
currency.
This
Year International
Monetary Fund (IMF) released its World
Economic Outlook report on 21 January 2014. The IMF projected the Indian
economy’s growth at 4.5 percent for 2013-14 which is much less than ASEAN
countries such as Indonesia, and Philippines. IMF in its earlier report in
October 2013 had projected that Indian economy would grow by 3.8 percent in
2013-14. The lower growth rate of 3.8 percent was caused due to global slowdown
and domestic factors like interest rates.
However, with India receiving a favourable
monsoon and higher export revenues since October 2013, the growth in the second
largest economy of Asia picked up. The growth is expected to firm further on
strong structural polices supporting investment. The economic growth rate can
expand up to 5.4 percent and 6.4 percent in next two fiscals. The ASEAN
countries Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam had grown by
5.7 percent in 2012. The Economic growth in Indonesia and the Philippines are
due to strong fundamentals such as strong consumption and investment, diversified
exports and low policy rates.
IMF sees growth rising to 5.4 per cent in 2014-15 and 6.4 per cent in the year after, which is lower than the respective 6.2 per cent and 7.1 per cent recovery forecast by its Bretton Woods twin, the World Bank.
IMF sees growth rising to 5.4 per cent in 2014-15 and 6.4 per cent in the year after, which is lower than the respective 6.2 per cent and 7.1 per cent recovery forecast by its Bretton Woods twin, the World Bank.
The estimate for 2014-15 is marginally higher than the
October forecast of 5 per cent. The fund said global activity strengthened in
the second half of 2013 and expects it to gather pace thanks to a recovery in
advanced economies. It sees 2014 calendar growth at 3.7 per cent against 3.6
per cent estimated earlier, which is forecast to rise to 3.9 per cent in 2015.
"The
basic reason behind the stronger recovery is that the brakes to the recovery
are progressively being loosened. The drag from fiscal consolidation is
diminishing. The financial system is slowly healing. Uncertainty is
decreasing," said Olivier Blanchard, IMF chief economist. The report - Is
the tide rising? - warns that "downward revisions to growth forecasts in
some economies highlight continued fragilities, and downside risks
remain".
Conclusion-
India's growth potential remains high but its
macroeconomic vulnerabilities – high headline inflation, an elevated current
account deficit, and rising pressure on fiscal balances. The IMF projected the Indian economy’s growth at 4.5 percent
for 2013-14 which is much less than ASEAN countries such as Indonesia, and
Philippines. The IMF’s main goal is to ensure the stability of the
international monetary and financial system. It helps resolve crises, and
works with its member countries to promote growth and alleviate poverty. It has
three main tools at its disposal to carry out its mandate: surveillance,
technical assistance and training, and lending. These functions are underpinned
by the IMF’s research and statistics. The IMF promotes economic stability and global growth by encouraging countries
to adopt sound economic and financial policies. To do this, it regularly
monitors global, regional, and national economic developments. It also seeks to
assess the impact of the policies of individual countries on other economies.
Reference-
1. Article from Jagran Josh
2. www.financialexpress.com IMF India Growth Forecast
3.www.thehindu.com
4.www.imf.org
No comments:
Post a Comment