gjimt2014managersf1
Saturday, 1 August 2020
Sunday, 30 March 2014
1273552, HARSIMRAT KAUR , F1, Q 31
Comment on factors
impacting growth in Non-life insurance
INTRODUCTION
General Insurance or non-life insurance policies, including automobile and
homeowners policies, provide payments depending on the loss from a particular
financial event. General insurance typically comprises any insurance that is
not determined to be life insurance. It is called property and casualty insurance in the U.S. and Canada and Non-Life Insurance in Continental Europe.
The total Gross Written Premium (GWP) for the Indian general
insurance industry during FY 2012-13 was
INR69,081 Crores (USD12,592 million) as against INR58,120 Crores (USD10,594
million) in FY 2011-12 representing an annual growth of a little over 18
per cent.
Ø ICICI Lombard’s total business at INR6134 Crores (USD1,118
million) is close to Oriental’s figure of INR6544 Crores (USD1,193 million).
Ø The industry business growth up to February 2013, over 2012, was
19.3 per cent as against 23.4 per cent in FY 2011-12.
DISCUSSION
CONDITION OF NON- LIFE INSURANCE:
·
Non-life companies should improve
their underwriting discipline and pricing should be based on their
assessment of risks. Free pricing — where insurers can fix premiums and offer
discounts — has also widened the choice for consumers.
·
Companies are offering customised products and also bundling insurance
products. However, a consumer who buys a non-life product sees it as an
expense. So, non-life insurance still plays second fiddle to life insurance. The premium collected by non-life
companies in India is only a fifth of the amount garnered by life companies.
·
Higher disposable incomes will
help push up the sales of non-life products — such as motor, health, property or
fire insurance — to individuals. The creation of more assets will also increase
sales of general insurance covers. Robust economic growth is, therefore, the
key to improving penetration in the non-life business.
·
Health insurance is a major driver, with a 40%
rise in the health premium during
the period under review. Clearly, with rising health costs, there is growing
awareness among consumers. However, pricing
is a cause for concern with hospitals overcharging patients. Costs can be
lowered if hospitals offer discounts to
insurers based on volumes. A pragmatic solution is for hospitals to adopt
low-cost models and a regulatory body to enforce fair competition among
hospitals. This will be in the interest of both consumers and insurers.
FACTORS OF GROWTH:
·
Due to inflation-related
increases in claims expenses, such as the rising cost of spare parts.
·
The inefficient underwriting practices in the industry
also contribute to the high claims rates. For example, only 2.6% of claims were
rejected by non-life industry in fiscal 2010-11.
·
The operational expense ratio
of the Indian non-life industry deteriorated further in fiscal 2010-11 despite already
being the highest globally.
·
This deterioration was evident
among both public and private insurers. Operational expenses increased as
insurance players continued to invest in the expansion of their business and to
compete with incoming international players.
·
India’s Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority (IRDA) is contemplating an increase in the limit on foreign direct investment in insurers to
49% from 26%.
·
.The acquisition ratio of India’s non-life insurers declined in fiscal
2010-11 as new and low-cost distribution
channels emerged, especially among private-sector providers, where acquisition
costs are lower than among public insurers. As a result, total commission
expenses rose by only 9.7% despite GWP growth of 19.8%.
·
Investment income for India’s non-life industry remained
stable in fiscal 2010-11, primarily due to the strong performance by local
equity markets during the year.
·
The industry’s high investment ratio continued to help
the Indian non-life industry compensate for poor underwriting results.
NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKETS IN CHINA AND INDIA ARE FAST
GAINING IMPORTANCE IN THE ASIAN REGION: After
a break in 2001, growth rates in the non-life insurance business resumed their faster
pace. It expected growth to
substantially exceed that of most OECD markets. Nonetheless, it added, weak
stock markets in 2001 and 2002 had taken their toll on insurers' capital bases,
thus reinforcing the need to focus on underwriting quality.
·
Deregulation and phase-out of state ownership were fast
reshaping the insurance landscape, and the industry would see further
consolidation in the coming years.
·
This would lead to more concentrated and polarised
markets. State-owned insurers were still a significant force in Asia -
accounting for over a fourth of the premiums outside Japan, while foreign
insurers - though making up some 40 per cent of all insurers - had only a 10
per cent market share.
·
Nevertheless, foreign insurers were poised to take on a
more active role in the development of the region's insurance business over the
medium to longer term, despite recent reticence in business expansion.
CONCLUSION :
In the long run the
insurance industry is still poised for a strong growth as the domestic economy
is expected to grow steadily. This will lead to rise in per capita and
disposable income, while savings are expected to be stable.
The non-life
insurance industry has been growing in excess of 20% over the last two years however the penetration was as low as 0.7% of the GDP in FY10. The key factors
for growth include:
- Product pricing,
innovation and simplicity
- Distribution
- Compensation
- Governance and
regulatory changes
- Health insurance
- Innovative
products to counter the competition
- Improved fraud
control mechanisms
Comment on factors
impacting growth in Non-life insurance
INTRODUCTION
General Insurance or non-life insurance policies, including automobile and
homeowners policies, provide payments depending on the loss from a particular
financial event. General insurance typically comprises any insurance that is
not determined to be life insurance. It is called property and casualty insurance in the U.S. and Canada and Non-Life Insurance in Continental Europe.
The total Gross Written Premium (GWP) for the Indian general
insurance industry during FY 2012-13 was
INR69,081 Crores (USD12,592 million) as against INR58,120 Crores (USD10,594
million) in FY 2011-12 representing an annual growth of a little over 18
per cent.
Ø ICICI Lombard’s total business at INR6134 Crores (USD1,118
million) is close to Oriental’s figure of INR6544 Crores (USD1,193 million).
Ø The industry business growth up to February 2013, over 2012, was
19.3 per cent as against 23.4 per cent in FY 2011-12.
DISCUSSION
CONDITION OF NON- LIFE INSURANCE:
·
Non-life companies should improve
their underwriting discipline and pricing should be based on their
assessment of risks. Free pricing — where insurers can fix premiums and offer
discounts — has also widened the choice for consumers.
·
Companies are offering customised products and also bundling insurance
products. However, a consumer who buys a non-life product sees it as an
expense. So, non-life insurance still plays second fiddle to life insurance. The premium collected by non-life
companies in India is only a fifth of the amount garnered by life companies.
·
Higher disposable incomes will
help push up the sales of non-life products — such as motor, health, property or
fire insurance — to individuals. The creation of more assets will also increase
sales of general insurance covers. Robust economic growth is, therefore, the
key to improving penetration in the non-life business.
·
Health insurance is a major driver, with a 40%
rise in the health premium during
the period under review. Clearly, with rising health costs, there is growing
awareness among consumers. However, pricing
is a cause for concern with hospitals overcharging patients. Costs can be
lowered if hospitals offer discounts to
insurers based on volumes. A pragmatic solution is for hospitals to adopt
low-cost models and a regulatory body to enforce fair competition among
hospitals. This will be in the interest of both consumers and insurers.
FACTORS OF GROWTH:
·
Due to inflation-related
increases in claims expenses, such as the rising cost of spare parts.
·
The inefficient underwriting practices in the industry
also contribute to the high claims rates. For example, only 2.6% of claims were
rejected by non-life industry in fiscal 2010-11.
·
The operational expense ratio
of the Indian non-life industry deteriorated further in fiscal 2010-11 despite already
being the highest globally.
·
This deterioration was evident
among both public and private insurers. Operational expenses increased as
insurance players continued to invest in the expansion of their business and to
compete with incoming international players.
·
India’s Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority (IRDA) is contemplating an increase in the limit on foreign direct investment in insurers to
49% from 26%.
·
.The acquisition ratio of India’s non-life insurers declined in fiscal
2010-11 as new and low-cost distribution
channels emerged, especially among private-sector providers, where acquisition
costs are lower than among public insurers. As a result, total commission
expenses rose by only 9.7% despite GWP growth of 19.8%.
·
Investment income for India’s non-life industry remained
stable in fiscal 2010-11, primarily due to the strong performance by local
equity markets during the year.
·
The industry’s high investment ratio continued to help
the Indian non-life industry compensate for poor underwriting results.
NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKETS IN CHINA AND INDIA ARE FAST
GAINING IMPORTANCE IN THE ASIAN REGION: After
a break in 2001, growth rates in the non-life insurance business resumed their faster
pace. It expected growth to
substantially exceed that of most OECD markets. Nonetheless, it added, weak
stock markets in 2001 and 2002 had taken their toll on insurers' capital bases,
thus reinforcing the need to focus on underwriting quality.
·
Deregulation and phase-out of state ownership were fast
reshaping the insurance landscape, and the industry would see further
consolidation in the coming years.
·
This would lead to more concentrated and polarised
markets. State-owned insurers were still a significant force in Asia -
accounting for over a fourth of the premiums outside Japan, while foreign
insurers - though making up some 40 per cent of all insurers - had only a 10
per cent market share.
·
Nevertheless, foreign insurers were poised to take on a
more active role in the development of the region's insurance business over the
medium to longer term, despite recent reticence in business expansion.
CONCLUSION :
In the long run the
insurance industry is still poised for a strong growth as the domestic economy
is expected to grow steadily. This will lead to rise in per capita and
disposable income, while savings are expected to be stable.
The non-life
insurance industry has been growing in excess of 20% over the last two years however the penetration was as low as 0.7% of the GDP in FY10. The key factors
for growth include:
- Product pricing,
innovation and simplicity
- Distribution
- Compensation
- Governance and
regulatory changes
- Health insurance
- Innovative
products to counter the competition
- Improved fraud
control mechanisms
Saturday, 29 March 2014
1273539-Gurbir Singh Sidhu-F1-Q23 Comment on Products strategy and design in the present scenario
Introduction
Product design is the creation of
objects of utilitarian value to people. The Product Design involves an
understanding of materials, processes, ergonomics, human behaviour and systems.
The various product strategies are Product-Positioning, Product-Repositioning, Product-Overlap, Product
Scope, Product-Design, Product Elimination, New
Product, Diversification, Value-Marketing.
Discussion
Product Strategy
Core product – this is the end
benefit for the buyer and answers the question: What is the buyer really
buying? For example, the buyer of a car is buying a means of transport, the
buyer of an aspirin is buying pain relief and the buyer of financial advice is
hoping to buy financial security and peace of mind.
Formal product – this is the actual
physical or perceived characteristics of your product including its level of
quality, special features, styling, branding and packaging.
Augmented product – the support items
that complete your total product offering such as after-sales service,
warranty, delivery and installation.
Product Design
Innovation provides much of the
competitive impetus for the development of new products, with new technology
often requiring a new design interpretation. It only takes one manufacturer to
create a new product paradigm to force the rest of the industry to catch up - fuelling
further innovation. Products designed to benefit people of all ages and
abilities—without penalty to any group—accommodate our swelling aging
population by extending independence and supporting the changing physical and
sensory needs we all encounter as we grow older.
Conclusion
Product designers need to consider all
of the details: the ways people use and abuse objects, faulty products, errors
made in the design process, and the desirable ways in which people wish they
could use objects. Many new designs will fail and many won't even make it to market.
Some designs eventually become obsolete.
Choosing and implementing your product
positioning strategy is an important task. You need to determine your product’s
competitive advantages (i.e.: what sets it apart from its competitors) and then
based on this information, decide how to position your offering in the market.
Quality, features, design, branding, packaging, labelling and service all
affect the way your product is positioned.
Formal product – this is the actual physical or perceived characteristics of your product including its level of quality, special features, styling, branding and packaging.
Augmented product – the support items that complete your total product offering such as after-sales service, warranty, delivery and installation.
Thursday, 27 March 2014
1273566 madhu kumari>ques 2 Comment on Standardization to reduce claims loss in Non-Life Insurance
ques 1> 1273566- madhu kumari F1> Rajat kumar >F2 http://youtu.be/1_p4LPfSoA8
ques 2> Comment on Standardization to reduce claims loss in Non-Life Insurance ?
ques 2> Comment on Standardization to reduce claims loss in Non-Life Insurance ?
INTRODUCTION
insurance is the
equitable transfer of the risk of a loss, from one entity to another in
exchange for payment. It is a form of risk management primarily used to hedge against the risk of a contingent, uncertain loss.
According
to study texts of The Chartered Insurance Institute, there are the following
categories of risk.
- Financial risks which means that the risk must have financial measurement.
- Pure risks which means that the risk must be real and not related to gambling
- Particular risks which means that these risks are not widespread in their effect, for example such as earthquake risk for the region prone to it.
Discussion
The non-life insurance industry is
poised to register a net loss in the fourth quarter, due to the anticipated
deluge of claims in the aftermath of “Supertyphoon Yolanda.”
The Insurance Commission said the
total insurance coverage in areas hardest hit by Supertyphoon Yolanda was
estimated at P70 billion, the bulk of which was accounted for by the non-life
insurance sector.
“The non-life insurance industry
posted a significant increase in net income in the first three quarters of the
year. Unfortunately, that net income may be wiped out in the fourth quarter,”
Insurance Commissioner Emmanuel Dooc said in a briefing Wednesday.
He said the expected loss of
non-life insurance firms in the last quarter of 2013 would be due to claims
related to Yolanda and the recent earthquake.
Conclusion
The
qualitative answer that the optimal capital rule(s) should satisfy two general
principles.
First,
the additional capital required for firms believed to be inadequately
capitalized should be
less
than the amount that would be required if they were known with certainty to be
inadequately
capitalized.
With imperfect risk assessment (classification), capital requirements for firms
that
appear
weak should be tempered: they should be lower than the optimal amounts with
perfect
risk
assessment. The intuition is straightforward. Because higher capital
requirements distort
some
sound firms’ decisions (and fail to constrain some weak firms), tempering of
the
requirements
reduces those costs and minimizes total costs. While tempering sacrifices
benefits
for
correctly classified weak firms, it reduces costs for sound firms that are
mistakenly constrained by the rule The
second general principle deals with the relationship between capital
requirement
stringency
(the efficient level of tempering) and the extent of market discipline. As
market
discipline
increases, fewer firms will hold too little capital in relation to risk without
capital
regulation.
For a given Type 1 error rate (proportion of sound firms forced to hold more
capital),
higher
market discipline therefore implies that decisions of a greater number of sound
firms’ will
be
inefficiently distorted. Moreover, for a given level of power to identify weak
firms correctly
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)